Group, Network or Collective?


Are the participants of NGL a group, network, collective or something else?

groupSimilarly to Natalie’s post (“Groups, Networks, Sets, Collectives”, 2016), I believe that participants of NGL (a university subject I am currently undertaking) are a group. I will justify this statement by addressing some of the criteria laid out by Dron and Anderson (2014).

Each can play a role in the learning experience for anyone affected by them.”

Our experiences in our shared journey to better understand the topics we are studying influence one another. The postings and responses that each of us make have an influence on all other students who take time to read them. Assessment activity 2 requires peer review, which will directly influence the decisions each student makes when developing their final essay.

Groups often have formal lines of authority and roles.

Each member of the course has a designated role as either an enrolled student or, in David’s case, the teacher. These roles govern our behaviour and responsibilities.

They (groups) are structured around particular tasks or activities.

Our course is structured around successfully completing the two assigned assessment tasks. Upon completion of these tasks, our goals will have been achieved and the group will disperse. Does this mean that groups are time based? Does each new semester of this NGL course mean a new group is created or that the same group continues as members change? I believe the latter is true. The purpose of the group is what defines it, not its members.

Groups often have schedules: members frequently use and create opportunities to meet face-to-face or online through synchronous activities, and their modes of interaction are typically many-to-many or one-to-many.

This too, is true for the NGL participants. Assignments have specified due dates and postings need to be made frequently. A Zoom session has also been conducted to allow real-time communication.


Dron, J. & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.

Groups, Networks, Sets, Collectives. (2016). Nat8117. Retrieved from


5 thoughts on “Group, Network or Collective?

    1. It’s taking me a while to absorb and understand the readings, which is one of the reasons I have been slow to engage with members of this unit. I think I’m starting to pick up steam now. It might be helpful if we share the areas that have trouble interpreting. I think we often have the correct answer but our uncertainty slows us down.


  1. Just a quick note on the peer review for Assignment 2, the definition of “peer” doesn’t has to be limited to participants in the course. In fact, I’d encourage you to actively look for peers outside of the course. Perhaps colleagues in similar “as teacher” contexts as you who can give feedback from that perspective, rather than the NGL perspective.

    And, echoing my last comment, increasing the diversity in the feedback should be useful.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s